Grey Wolves and the ESA, What’s Next?

The recent news that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has halted their plans to remove the grey wolf  from the Endangered Species Act (ESA) imparts a feeling of guarded hope.

Defenders of Wildlife

Defenders of Wildlife

Why the indefinite delay was ordered is unclear, but perhaps the pressure exerted by the general public, government officials and wildlife biologists has had an effect.

Last week, a letter sent to Interior Secretary Sally Jewell from Arizona Congressman Raul Grijalva urged the pause on delisting to be made permanent. Grijalva states,  ”Now is the time to support full wolf recovery, not shut down our efforts.”

Other letters in support of the grey wolf have also made their way to Jewell’s office. One from the American Society of Mammologists explains that the society members anticipate the day when wolves no longer need federal protection, but they add, “… we believe it is premature to declare that that day has arrived.”

Sixteen scientists from around the globe, who have a vested interest in the decision because, “Collectively, we represent many of the scientists responsible for the research referenced in the draft rule,” sent Jewell a letter as well. Their response details the lack of evidence for taking wolves off the Endangered Species List.  This letter also explains that the Pacific wolf population should be seen as a distinct population, partly due to the fact that genetic studies have shown that some of these wolves are comprised of stock from the rare coastal British Columbia wolves. The sixteen scientists argue that while the Mexican grey wolf should certainly be protected by Federal Law, there must be a specific geographic area designated to keep them safe in. The letter also doubts the reasoning behind the proposal to prematurely name Canis lupus lyacon (Eastern grey wolf) as a separate species.

Thousands have emailed Jewell in a plea to keep the wolf on the Endangered Species List. This move won’t help wolves in areas where they are already controlled by the states, but the ruling is crucial for the rest of the country, including Oregon and Washington, where wolf populations are just beginning to stabilize. So far, no state government has stood up to protect their wolves. It is doubtful that any will, expect perhaps California where a move is underway to maintain the grey wolf under their own Endangered Species Act.

This is a crucial moment not only for the grey wolf but for the future interpretation of the Endangered Species Act. As Garrick Dutcher of Living with Wolves says, “Wise forward-thinking policy brought wolves back and advancing science has revealed and recorded the central role wolves play in restoring vitality to ecosystems. But today, science may be forced to take a back seat as political decisions once again threaten to shift policy out of their favor. For all the successes of the Endangered Species Act, the true test of its brawn is knocking at the door. Will the entrenched land use issues that saw the original demise of America’s wolves prevail as they once again are hunted, trapped and snared to ecologically irrelevant numbers? Or will wolves be allowed to achieve a real recovery?”

If the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has delayed the delisting due to external pressure we have reason to feel hopeful. However Defenders of Wildlife’s Suzanne Asha Stone reminds us, “Don’t trust this pause in the storm. It is only the calm eye in the middle of the hurricane. Time to pump up the volume even more.”

When I inquired as to what you and I can do to help, Suzanne replied. “…call, write, yell, plead, and beg with Secretary Jewell, and anyone in congress or the White House who will listen.

We can’t let this good news allow for complacency. Contact Jewell at the Department of the Interior, through Defenders of Wildlife or another proactive non-profit. Peruse the excellent website of Center For Biological Diversity for more ways to make sure your voice is heard.

wolves

Photo courtesy of Living with Wolves

Amaroq Weiss On Wolves in the Pacific Northwest

wolf drawing

The following article by Amaroq Weiss appeared in the Sacramento Bee last month. I’m sharing it so you won’t miss the useful information and the far sighted thinking Weiss reveals here. We still have a chance in Oregon and California to provide a better future for wolves, one that implements science and minimizes fear-based decisions. Let’s work together in speaking up for wolves and  supporting organizations such as Center for Biological Diversity, Oregon Wild, and the Pacific Wolf Coalition.

Viewpoints: State’s wolf management plan could set tone for U.S.

7FO7WEISS.JPG

California resident Amaroq Weiss, a biologist and former attorney who has been working to recover wolves in the West for 16 years, is West Coast Wolf Organizer for the Center for Biological Diversity. Reach her ataweiss@biologicaldiversity.org

By Amaroq Weiss
Special to The Bee
Published: Sunday, Apr. 7, 2013 – 12:00 am | Page 5E
Last Modified: Sunday, Apr. 7, 2013 – 2:15 pm

During the 15 months the wolf known as OR7 has crisscrossed the Oregon-California border, the news from his birthplace back in Eastern Oregon has shaken the boots off some of those holding most tightly to deeply rooted misperceptions about the ability of wolves to coexist on the landscape with the rest of us.

In the two years since a lawsuit stopped the state of Oregon from killing wolves, the state’s fledgling wolf population has doubled to nearly 50. Yet in Wallowa County, where the majority of Oregon’s wolf-livestock conflicts are reported each year, fatal wolf attacks on livestock have fallen by 60 percent as ranchers and agencies were forced to rely on nonlethal conflict-prevention methods.

At the same time in neighboring Idaho, where over the last two years hunters, trappers and state agents have killed more than 700 wolves, the number of sheep and cattle killed by wolves increased by more than 75 percent.

In fact, those trends reflect exactly what biologists and wolf experts have been telling anyone who would listen since wolves became one of the first animals to be protected by the Endangered Species Act when it was passed, 40 years ago: Tried-and-true, centuries-old nonlethal wolf management techniques such as range-riding, livestock-guarding dogs and appropriate fencing greatly reduce predation by wolves on livestock.

And it reinforces the fact that killing wolves and leaving behind orphaned pups and dispersed packs actually increases the chances of livestock being killed, because once the order of the pack is destroyed, so is the natural pack discipline of teaching younger wolves to kill natural prey such as deer and elk, leaving lone wolves with no choice but to take down the easiest prey they can find to survive.

Those lessons come at a valuable time for Californians during the current public comment period, which ends in May, on whether we should protect wolves under the state Endangered Species Act.

It reminds us that as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service moves toward dropping federal protections for wolves in the lower 48 states, we have a great opportunity to build a wolf management plan that sets a national example of how wolves can coexist with human endeavors.

Wolf experts have long said California has hundreds of thousands of acres of excellent wolf habitat. Of course, California is also the nation’s most populated state and home to a thriving livestock industry of more than 6 million cattle and sheep.

With 163,000 square miles, California is the nation’s third-largest state, behind only Alaska and Texas. And that means we’re in a great position to share the land we’ve inherited with the species we purposefully killed off in California and many other western states.

The return of wolves to California is a promising event for many of us fortunate enough to make our home here in the Bear Republic, where the state flag, featuring an image of the state’s last known grizzly, says a lot about how we see ourselves.

Like residents of the other 49 states, we, too, are concerned about jobs, taxes, education, climate change and the length of our commutes.

But the people who make up our state’s ever-swelling population continue to represent Western ideals as old as the state, from an ongoing pioneer-style willingness to go where others have not, to a belief in fresh starts.

Even for wolves.

The arrival of OR7 in California in December 2011 shows it’s only a matter of time before wolves once again make their homes in our state. And given that animals live in ecosystems rather than states, whether OR7 decides to put down roots here is only a side issue in a much larger ecological evolution, one that wolf experts say will surely result in wolves returning permanently to California.

They’re coming – the question is, will we be ready to protect them?

Efforts to make sure those protections are in place were put in motion last fall when state officials recommended that California extend endangered species protections to OR7 and all that follow him. That recommendation will be ruled on in October.

In the meantime, let’s be clear: Recovering wolves to their historic range will take discipline and the acceptance that they, like the rest of us, have a right to be here. It won’t always be easy.

But as the mounting evidence from neighboring Oregon shows, it can be done and done well, if we’re willing.

California resident Amaroq Weiss, a biologist and former attorney who has been working to recover wolves in the West for 16 years, is West Coast Wolf Organizer for the Center for Biological Diversity. Reach her at aweiss@biologicaldiversity.org

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Review: The Hidden Life of Wolves

I’m happy to say that a review I wrote on this amazing book was published in last weekend’s Oregonian. If you haven’t read Jim and Jamie Dutcher’s (of Living with Wolves) new book yet, make sure you do. This is an important work, rich with not only photographs but also with science and history and current information on wolves.  This book will help you become a stronger and better informed wolf advocate.

http://www.oregonlive.com/books/index.ssf/2013/04/the_hidden_lives_of_wolves_rev.html

‘The Hidden Lives of Wolves’ review: In the company of wolves

Special to The OregonianBy Special to The Oregonian 
Follow on Twitter
on April 27, 2013 at 10:10 AM

“The Hidden Life of Wolves” by Jim and Jamie DutcherNational Geographic Books

THE HIDDEN LIFE OF WOLVES 
Jim and Jamie Dutcher
National Geographic Press
$25, 210 pages

For six years they shared a 25-acre enclosure at the base of Idaho’s Sawtooth Mountains with a pack of wolves. Their office was a Mongolian yurt; their sleeping quarters a canvas tent. The path to the outhouse required frequent snow-shoveling for below-zero excursions.

This was the life of Jim and Jamie Dutcher, award-winning documentary filmmakers. Their new book, “The Hidden Life of Wolves,” is the culminating portrayal of their experiences.

Although “The Hidden Lives of Wolves” is an oversized book and contains hundreds of the Dutchers’ compelling photographs, as well as maps and illustrations, it is not a coffee-table book. The text contains an extensive study of wolves, both those inside and out of the enclosure, comparable in depth to Barry Lopez’s “Of Wolves and Men.”

“The Hidden Life of Wolves” details all aspects of wolf life, their social structure, hunting techniques and body language, as well as human-influenced issues, including the Yellowstone and central Idaho wolf reintroductions of the mid-1990s.

Readers explore the similarities between the eradication of wolves in the 1800s and the current profusion of hunting and trapping, made legal when wolves were dropped from the Endangered Species List in 2011. Solutions to wolf problems, including livestock depredation, are explored. The Little Red Riding Hood myth is thoroughly debunked. There are references to many authorities, including Aldo Leopold, Gordon Haber, L. David Mech and Carter Niemeyer.

The Dutchers suggest the wolf “may be the greatest shape-shifter in the animal kingdom,” acknowledging the vast disparity in our opinions of Canis lupus. Through intensive observation of their hand-raised pack, the Dutchers gained intimate knowledge of the inner workings of wolves. Their conclusion was that their subjects were extremely social and complex animals that were “neither demon, nor deity, nor data.”

Readers come to know the Sawtooth wolves personally. Kamots is the benevolent leader. Without undue force, this striking gray wolf maintains order among his peers. Littermate Lakota is larger than Kamots yet remains at the bottom of the pecking order, often harassed by the other wolves. Younger brother Matsi comes to Lakota’s rescue, blocking blows from offending wolves. Amani, the adoring uncle to all pups in the pack, endures onslaughts of sharp puppy teeth.

These and other wolves are brought to life as they interact with each other and with the Dutchers, who record the wolves with camera and sound device, their hearts never quite out of the picture but at a distance that allows for an objective view.

Published by National Geographic and with a forward by Robert Redford, “The Hidden Life of Wolves” is a richly layered work that speaks to the intricate and controversial relationship between wolves and humans.

While some see the wolf as a scapegoat for a litany of evils, the Dutchers maintain: “More than wolves themselves, it is our relationship with them that needs to be managed.” Their aptly titled book is a valuable guide for this process.

– Beckie Elgin

Journey Visits Ashland

OR 7 SE of Alturas, CA on March 6, 2013

OR 7 SE of Alturas, CA on March 6, 2013

It was reported today that OR 7, better known as Journey, has returned to Jackson County and has been hanging out near Emigrant Lake. Emigrant Lake is a large reservoir and popular recreation site five miles south of Ashland. An interesting bit of trivia is that when the lake was expanded in 1960 it completely submerged the tiny town of Klamath Junction.

Emigrant sign

Journey has gone as far south as Yreka in his recent travels, twice crossing over busy Interstate 5. This is as far west as he has ever traveled. Before returning south on his travels, he trotted north to Douglas County, near Diamond Lake.

Ashland is where I live, and people here are excited to know that a wild, grey wolf is close at hand. If there were ever a place where wolves would be accepted, Ashland is it. Our population tends to be progressive and environmentally concerned. Ashland was a top ten finalist in Outside Magazine’s search for the best town in America in 2011. Nestled in the Rogue Valley, with the Siskiyou Mountains looming behind us, Ashland is truly a wonderful place.

OR 7 footprint

But when I drive past Emigrant Lake this morning I gazed at all the small farms in the area, with fields full of cattle, goats, horses. Would Journey be enticed by an easy meal? I talk to my good friend, Ann Barton, about the arrival of Journey and she jokes that maybe he’ll come into town and relieve us of our surplus deer population. Ashland is known for these resident deer, well over two-hundred of them at last count. They eat gardens, saunter across busy roads, occasionally attack dogs and humans. When my son Dylan was in his teens, he was hurrying home late at night when he inadvertently stepped between a doe and her fawn. Next thing he knew he was on the ground, battling a pair of sharp hooves. I told him the deer were actually hired by the Ashland Police Department to enforce the midnight curfew. He didn’t buy it, but he did develop a healthy respect for deer.

My daughter, Megan, an avid runner, often takes Rhaja, her Rhodesian Ridgeback on long treks around Emigrant Lake. She is going this afternoon. I told her to keep an eye out for a slim, grey wolf, or at least his footprints. And I told her to keep Rhaja close at hand, knowing how lonely that wolf must be.

Meg and Rhaj

Megan and Rhaja

Montana Wolf Council Meeting

Photo courtesy of  National Park Service

Photo courtesy of National Park Service

Friday’s meeting of the Montana Wolf Management Advisory Council leaves me even more concerned about the fate of the grey wolf in the west.

The original council, consisting of a dozen individuals, were instrumental in developing Montana’s wolf management plan back in 2000. They met again in 2007. Called in by Governor Bullock and Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) Director Jeff Hagener, ten members gathered Friday with FWP officials to discuss how well the wolf plan has been carried out.

For a group that is called a “citizens council” the Wolf Council seems to lean heavily on the side of livestock production and hunting. For example, the chairman of the group is Chase Hibbard of Billings, an avid hunter, outfitter, and a rancher.

Another rancher and former Republican Representative, Bruce Malcom, went so far as to suggest a bounty to limit wolf populations. I had hoped that word would never come up again in regards to wolves.

There was also talk of gathering a list of trappers  in case wolves begin to overrun the state.  It appears fear and control have become the catchwords of wolf management

There were some positives that emerged from Friday’s meeting. Biologist Mike Jiminez of the USFWS gave an insightful discourse on the status of wolves before and after delisting.

Wolfwatcher representative Brad Orsted made the wise suggestion that the Governor, “… assemble a new council comprised of not only ranchers and sportsman but a fair share of independent biologists and citizens of Montana who are also affected by wolf management policies.”

And Wolves of the Rockies Marc Cooke had a seat at the Wolf Council table, a huge step toward a more just and hopeful future for wolves . With Marc’s permission I am sharing with you their review of the meeting. Don’t miss reading Kim Bean’s blog post as well. It can be found on the WotR website.

http://wolvesoftherockies.org/montana-wolf-advisory-council-2013/

Montana Governor Steve Bullock opened the MtWAC

Montana Governor Steve Bullock opened the MtWAC

WOLF COUNCIL SUMMARY

On April 12th, 2013 in Helena, Montana at MFWP Headquarters, the Wolf Advisory Council reconvened at the request of Governor Steve Bullock.

Wolves of the Rockies had a seat at the table, and we discussed one topic with many components.

Governor Bullock opened with a short statement about the importance of the Wolf Advisory Council.

Ken McDonald and George Pauley went over many of the wolf plan management components. They are concerned about new laws coming from the current Montana Legislative session.

Right now in Montana there are approximately 50 collared wolves.
Research  is critical in helping the decision makers in making informed science based decisions.

 Humans have the greatest impact on elk herd sizes.

MtFWP George Pauley covered many topics

MtFWP George Pauley covered many topics

There was great concern over the entire Yellowstone National Park wolf situation.
Wolves of the Rockies shared their concerns about Yellowstone wolves, and their value to the economy of local residents and businesses in Gardiner, and areas along the border of YNP. We emphasized research from the Yellowstone Wolf Program is priceless. Several members of the audience participated by reaffirming the importance of Yellowstone wolves.

Getting back to the council members, several encouraged the decision makers not to treat Yellowstone wolves any different than other wolves in Montana, as it would set a precedent that could snowball in the future.

Other council members said Yellowstone wolves are indeed different. They have a research and economic value for the local people as well as FWP and hunters alike.

Retired Legal Council for MtFWP Bob Lane

Retired Legal Council for MtFWP Bob Lane

Furthermore there should be no cap on the amount of wolves in Montana. This could only lead to further concern down the road. The wolves should be treated like any other predator here in Montana: no caps.

It is hoped that house bills 73, which was signed by the governor in February, will give additional tools to help manage wolves, we need to be cautious of future legislation that will have an impact on wolf management. If wolf numbers drop to 200/250, this will trigger a revue with the Federal Government.

Cause for concern with FWP is funding. 2015 will be the last year the federal government will provide FWP funding for the wolf program ie., depredation loss compensation et al.
Montana is very concerned about where this funding will come from starting in 2016.

Caroline Sime, the former Wolf Management Coordinator for MT FWP,  was asked to attend but declined.

Toward the end of the meeting the Chairman of the advisory council, Chase Hibbard, conducted a round-table discussion; where do we go from here?

L to R: Marc Cooke, Wolves of the Rockies, MtFWP Commissioner Bob Ream, Terry Beaver & Robin Hompesch

L to R: Marc Cooke, Wolves of the Rockies, MtFWP Commissioner Bob Ream, Terry Beaver & Robin Hompesch

Topics discussed:
We need to improve social tolerance and the use of non-lethal measures.
Several members suggested allowing things in Montana to evolve naturally.
Many members believe the wolf management plan is balanced but are concerned with the increase in extreme attitudes toward wolves.
Some members believe that with new science the plan needs to be “tweaked” because of too many wolves in Montana.
One member suggested we let wolves find their own place on the landscape, and that we should manage by location not by population.

We need to let the public in on these plans and some advisory members believe that hunters and sportsmen have to give some.

The Blackfeet reservation plan is working well.
Some believe there is still a role for the Wolf Advisory Council or something similar.

Consensus was that the plan is going well but more aggressive outreach is needed.
We are moving from the recovery mode to the management mode and we need more public involvement, was not comfortable to having to do this but believe it to be essential.

One member would like to have a bounty on wolves in the future, as people will lose the incentive to hunt them.
We need to be very careful on the boundary around Yellowstone National Park.  This would increase (in the eyes of some members) the boundary of the park.
It should be considered to alter or combine some of hunting districts to accommodate various needs. This was a response that was directed towards YNP.

L to R: Marc Cooke, Vice President Kim Bean WotR and Ilona Popper from The Bear Creek Council discussing wolf advisory issues at a break.

L to R: Marc Cooke, Vice President Kim Bean WotR and Ilona Popper from The Bear Creek Council discussing wolf advisory issues at a break. 

Wolves of the Rockies will continue to work with hunters, livestock owners/managers, and all other parties to increase public acceptance of wolves on the landscape.

          Please support on Facebook Wolves of the Rockies.

                         ”Because we are their only voice”

Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks Director Jeff Hagener

Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks Director Jeff Hagener

U.S.Fish & Wildlife Service NRM Wolf Recovery Program Coordinator Mike Jinenez

U.S.Fish & Wildlife Service NRM Wolf Recovery Program Coordinator Mike Jinenez

MtWAC Chair Chase Hibbard

MtWAC Chair Chase Hibbard

Justin Gude from MtFWP gave a brief lecture on research of predators and ungulates

Justin Gude from MtFWP gave a brief lecture on research of predators and ungulates

Elegy For a Wolf

Last month a beautifully done video was featured on the Wolves of the Rockies website. The video was an elegy to Yellowstone wolf #832, also known as #06, the renown alpha female of the Lamar Canyon pack.  Emmy award winning cinematographer Bob Landis created the video that has touched so many.

I caught up with Tara Smithee, who interned with Bob Landis at Yellowstone in March. Tara wrote the powerful poem, Ode to #832, and narrated it for the video. A poet since a young girl, she told me her words came from stories she heard from wolf watchers and rangers who were familiar with the enigmatic 06.

Tara

Tara

Tara, 25, spent her first six summers in Yellowstone, on the heels of her mother who worked in the park as a Naturalist. Her father was a commercial scuba diver, and Tara learned to love oceans as well as the wilderness.

This fall, Tara will attend Montana State University’s MFA program in Science and Natural History Filmmaking. Her goal is to make films that “…give a voice to wild places in the hope of furthering conservation.”

I’m sure we will hear more from Tara in the future, but for now enjoy the video on 06 and listen to her poignant words.

Journey Moves West

Journey, the enigmatic wandering wolf, seems to be retracing his footsteps of a year ago. The following article from today’s Medford Mail Tribune written by Mark Freeman discusses the wolf’s latest movements.

Why does this one wolf continue to attract the attention of so many?

In my estimation, Journey is a symbol of potential. This potential is that a wolf can return to areas where its ancestors once roamed. This wolf can be the leader for others. Eventually, these animals can repopulate and watch their species grow. And this can be done amidst humans, but without the interference wolves suffer elsewhere–in the Rocky Mountain States, the Southwest, even the Great Lakes States. I envision packs of wolves in Southern Oregon and Northern California living without the threat of trapping, hunting, baiting and poisoning. Wolves left to live a natural lifespan, to figure out their own existence as they are so capable of doing.

I’m dreaming, I know, but a beautiful one it is.

OR 7 footprint

Lone wolf on the prowl in Jackson County

OR-7 crossed Cascade crest on March 19; lobo still has no mate
March 27, 2013

Mark Freeman

Mail Tribune

Wandering wolf OR-7 is spending his second week back from California in Jackson County, where he’s been feeding on a dead elk as he continues his apparent search for a mate.

The 4-year-old wolf crossed the Cascade crest into Jackson County on March 19, his first trip back here since he left April 1, 2012, on the way to a much-publicized tour of Northern California.

Since his return, he’s wandered along the western Cascades east of Butte Falls and Prospect and has shared meals on a dead cow elk with at least one coyote and some ravens, says Mark Vargas, Rogue District wildlife biologist for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Vargas last week used a VHF receiver to follow the radio-transmitter that has been fitted on OR-7′s collar. Vargas was able to get close enough to register a strong signal, but he never actually saw the only confirmed wolf in Western Oregon since 1937.

But Vargas did find fresh wolf tracks in the snow.

“But it was just a single set of tracks,” Vargas says. “He’s alone.”

The tracks led to the carcass of a mostly picked-over cow elk. Coyote and raven tracks were also noted nearby, Vargas says.

“It was an interesting find,” he says.

The elk likely died on its own during the winter and probably was not killed by OR-7, he says.

“There’s no indication that he killed it,” Vargas says. “There was no sign of a struggle.”

Vargas installed a game camera and trained it on what’s left of the carcass. He had previously set other cameras in that same area as part of a Pacific fisher study.

“I’m hoping he gets in front of one of those things,” Vargas says. “I’m hoping to get a picture.”

A game camera placed by a Central Point hunter in the woods east of Butte Falls gave the world its first glimpse of OR-7 in November 2011. A handful of other photographs subsequently have been taken of OR-7, including a set of grainy images captured March 6 along Highway 139 in Modoc County.

This past week, OR-7 has stayed in somewhat familiar territory for him, Vargas says. The wolf crossed into Jackson County from Klamath County in the same general corridor he’s used in the past. He then headed north into the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, hovering around the 4,000-foot elevation, Vargas says.

OR-7, which dispersed from the Imnaha pack in Eastern Oregon in fall 2011, has spent most of the past year wandering around Northern California and even approached the Nevada border before turning north and west and returning to Oregon on March 12.

OR-7′s return brings to 47 the number of confirmed wolves in Oregon.

Reach reporter Mark Freeman at 541-776-4470 or mfreeman@mailtribune.com.