Should Journey Be Re-collared?

Journey May 3, 2014 in eastern Jackson County. Photo by USFWS

Journey May 3, 2014 in eastern Jackson County. Photo by USFWS

Articles have appeared telling us that efforts to trap OR 7, better known as Journey, have so far been unsuccessful. U.S. Fish and Wildlife biologist, John Stephenson along with another biologist with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, recently backpacked into the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest and stayed there for a week with the intention of trapping Journey, his mate, or their pups in order to collar them. All wolves eluded their efforts. The battery on Journey’s collar is due to expire soon and his signal will be lost, making future capture of the pack even more difficult. Besides, its getting pretty chilly for backpacking.

The reasons given for the collaring effort are so the USFWS and the ODFW can continue doing research on the wolves but also to help them monitor for the pack’s involvement in livestock losses. Stephenson is quoted as saying “ranchers in southern Oregon are worried,” and “Generally, wherever you have wolves in proximity to livestock you do get some level of depredation.” Radio collared wolves are much easier to locate. They often become the infamous “Judas wolf” by giving away the location of their pack so they can be lethally removed by Wildlife Services or other entities. There are dozens of examples of this, including the Wedge and Huckleberry packs in Washington.

But there are other, perhaps more far-reaching reasons to put those heavy, unattractive collars on at least a handful of wolves. Imagine if Journey had been a wolf without a collar, like his mate, known as Wandering Wanda. The world would know little to nothing about his amazing 3,000 mile venture from NE Oregon, into California, and back into Oregon. We would not have gained a vast amount of knowledge about the dispersal of wolves, nor would we have this poster child for the importance of wildlife corridors that enable animals to traverse the back country with some element of safety. Journey also represents how Oregon and California are doing a good job in preserving wild and open spaces so that an apex predator like the wolf can repopulate their native territories. And if Journey had been collarless, he may well have been shot and his death never revealed. Who knows how many dispersing wolves this happens to? The one who recently made it all the way to the Grand Canyon is one lucky wolf.

Journey's pup July 12, 2014. Photo by USFWS

Journey’s pup July 12, 2014. Photo by USFWS

The argument for and against collaring wolves is an interesting one. Do we need to manage them as much as we do, or should wolves be allowed to lead a less accountable life? What are your thoughts?


6 thoughts on “Should Journey Be Re-collared?

  1. Such a sensitive topic. If only people from all sides would be honest and ethical and not resort to “shoot first and ask later” there might be more opportunities for us all to find middle ground. A part of me wants him left alone as I don’t want harm to come to him and the other part of me wants him collared so no harm comes to him; its a sad place to be that feels hopeless. There has been so much going on that is not responsible that has led both sides to lose trust on many levels.


    • Wise response, thank you. More transparency from our state and federal wolf biologists would help to regain our trust in them. And we would like to feel secure that the wolf’s best interest is hand, not that of the handful of people who prefer the animals gone. Although the professionals in charge of the wolves are educated and for the most part well intentioned, I believe that wildlife and the wilderness belongs to all of us and perhaps we should be allowed more of a say in how it is handled.


  2. No don’t collar..they become targets for their own demise.
    Ranchers should be held responsible for taking care of their ‘product’.
    They should have fences, flagging and lights..just the cost of doing business in our wilderness areas. Long ago when folks had livestock they had to “shepherd” their herds coexist in our environment depends on the ranchers to do their part to deter depredation.
    A wolf won’t come near a flagged property. And why are we giving “grazing rights” in our wild areas anyway ..big problem..the “product” causes degradation of our publicly owned lands and they are not held responsible for the real cost of their “product” Their pay per ‘product head’ is laughable. I pay more for my car insurance.
    I don’t eat meat anymore, originally, because it is generated from a really serious environmental injustice and now I don’t want animals killed for my benefit …So now for me it is morally repugnant.
    So, in the end a collared wolf can become a dead wold real fast …Why not ‘collar’ the “product” and measure the environmental degradation they have wrecked upon OUR land. …!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s